Art does not need to be beautiful. Although this may be the mainstream definition of aesthetic theorists through art history, it is not an artistic requirement. Art does not necessarily bring happiness to audiences, art can interfere. That art is that it conveys feelings between artists and evokes these feelings of others. Vladimir Nabokov's lolita has been criticized as being dark and distorted, but it should be regarded as a work of art. Nabokov deliberately and intentionally wrote a book; he deliberately examined his emotions and succeeded in finding the right words to express his work to the reader.
Emily Prager was an introduction to the novel "Roger Fishbite" and pointed out that he wrote it primarily as a literary imitation of "Lolita" by Vladimir Nabokov. Reply of the icon being turned on. "Prager's novel scheduled for the 1990s is described by Lolita's character, 13-year-old lucky lady Linderhoff. Reading Lolita in Tehran is a memoir of Western literary classics on women's ban on Muslim Islamic world, whose writer Azar Nafisi was aware of the fundamentalism "moral force" of the 1980s explained. It is top notch. A story about the life of members of her book club. Critique commentary on Lolita and the other three Western novels. Lolita is particularly known as the ultimate "taboo" novel and is a metaphor for Iran's life. Nafashi said that its analogy is not allegorical (p. 35), and hopes to draw similarities between "victim and prisoner" (p. 37).
Lolita is one of the most traditional literary classics of the century. Lolita is a 12 year old girl, a desire of European intellectual Humbert Humbert. As a narrator in the story, Humber recorded his unusual childhood, youth experience, and adventure of prosperous Americans as European tourists and pedophiles. But when a boy shows a desire for a nymph, this is the key to realizing his first broken heart. This is very obvious in both novels and movies. I will show you the movie Lolita which firmly interpreted the novel of the same name.