"As long as the subject matter is as clear as we recognize, our discussion will suffice as there is no need to pursue accuracy in all discussions. Now the correct and only action of political science research is , Diverse and fluctuating opinion ... And we have to be satisfied with talking about these themes and using premises to show truth about ... from mathematicians and from rhetoric Accept possible conjections of the house According to scientific evidence at home, this obviously needs to be stupid in the same way. "
If the theme is clear enough to admit it, our discussion will be sufficient. Because not all crafts should be accurate in every discussion, not only. Fines and fair actions taken by the political science now recognize various perspectives and volatility, so they may not be essentially but may be considered to exist only in a customary way. While other people are dismissed for their courage, goods can cause harm to many people, so goods can cause similar fluctuations. So we talk about these themes, use such premises to talk about only the most realistic in order to roughly show the truth roughly, and make the same type of premise to draw conclusions Use it. Not good
Evidence - In terms of men being emotionally excited, they may differ in nature (E 4 P 33) and may differ from each other. But people are considered active only when acting based on reason (E 3 P 3), so even though reasonably rationality is defined (E 3 D 2), it is understood only by its humanity as its proximity I will. But since everyone follows their own nature, he waits for those who think they are good, trying to get rid of those who think they are bad (E 4 P 19), and we think about whether good or bad by reason It must be good or bad. (E2P41); Therefore, if people rely on a reasonable life, they have to do only good things for human nature (E 4 P 31 C), in other words, It is in harmony. Q. E. D