That's it. In his HBR article "IT is irrelevant," Nicholas Carr caused considerable controversy over the role of IT as a strategic business differentiation. He studied the evolution of IT and thought that the model it traces is very similar to early technologies such as railway and electricity. By the early years of their development, these technologies provided opportunities for competitive advantage. But as they become increasingly useful? Because they are everywhere? They became "commodity input" and lost the ability to strategically differentiate.
I tried the summary of the sentence. Since the summary should be abridged, I miss many things. Therefore, this account has no problem. But there is another way you may miss the problem. If you want to talk about Aristotle's anger (and should do so for a very legitimate reason), any summary should attempt to treat the main features of that position fairly. In addition, there are many views of Aristotle's text - at least three - major features
Right now I care whether who will read it first. But then I started thinking it was not a problem if it did not help those who read it. At some point, I will post the title and summary of the book. If it can not help you or someone you know, yes, because it's not for you, I do not mind whether you write. It is somewhat similar to preparing a big surprise party, but no one will appear. I am not a friend, not a family. It feels like preparing for dance, and your schedule will bring you up. This is my first time in my life, I am working on a project I do not expect. What are you expecting this "success"? Through my podcast, I have measurable goals. Throughout the project, I helped others and I have measurable goals. These goals determine whether it will succeed or not. In this book, I do not have this. At least I do not have it now. I am really enjoying this process and learning
If you like, you can read it, but a brief summary: women have boyfriend, and boyfriend has popular former colleagues. As a birthday drink did not tell a woman because she did not want to distract her because she was studying for the exam, the boyfriend met a popular former colleague. That woman is similar, I swear later and I am about to tell him I did not tell him a drink of my birthday. Considering only the original facts of the letter, I may agree with Dan (eg, yes, I do not want to miss my friend's birthday and I do not want to spoil your partner's study) . If the author of the letter is a bit agricultural, I will tend to stand by Dan. But instead she said a lot like this: