“Is Google Making Us Stupid” and “Get Smarter”

Humans are improving their technical efficiency everyday. Continually develop new inventions and innovations. The Internet is increasing "reliability" day by day. However, it was derived from the use of the Internet and the continuous improvement of smart technology. We should regard their contribution to the world as a benefactor or a curse. The synergistic effect of "artificial intelligence" in the technology we use everyday was tested by two prominent writers, Nicholas Carr and Jamias Cascio.

In January 2009, Carl Zimmer announced an article "How Google gets smarter" to explore 'magazines'. Zimmer's article is an answer to an article written by Nicholas Carr, "Does Google make a fool of us?" He did not agree with Karl's question and agree or accept concerns about Computer-Aeger It was difficult. Seriously this article states that social concerns about how the Internet adversely affects our thinking is rooted in the misunderstanding of how thinking works. I think that our idea is limited to a small space, but in reality it is not so. Our idea spreads ourselves and connects with our environment. We rely on information gathered from our surroundings. It is not all information on our minds. In addition to using our environment, we only use the information needed for the current task.

I can not refute the assertion that Google has made us foolish by promoting Google to make us wise. However, we can make it more aware of the situation, save time and claim that all of Google's content is not enough to request or stimulate the needs of relevant reading and thinking I will.

Nicholas Carr said that because his essay "Google makes us foolish" and the curiosity of information gained from Google is instantly fulfilled, our brains are in a way that shortens our attention I assert that it is made. As we rewire, we become oil skiers, we can not think of reading deeply, so we become stupid. Before I dig into the problem I would like to solve in his argument, I would like to take some time to verify the problem of agreeing with Carr, or at least its validity. The way I accept this response lacks certain prescriptions or even final specific positions. I do not think this question is black-and-white, so I will not approach this way.