“Are Too Many People Going to College?” by Charles Murray

Some people think that this question "How many people go to university?" Should not be asked.

Talk about different kinds of literature other than language literacy, such as culture, science, geography.

By sharing these core knowledge, we can strengthen our identity as a unified American.

Many 18-year-olds may reach the lowest level of ability to enroll in college, but they should not go

The university accepts many people who can not succeed the course and can not lead to dropouts

I think that work in the classroom for 4 years is too much for many occupations. And the Internet made the "4 year practical facility college" obsolete.

Murray raised three objections as to why this type of education works and then insists on why the Internet's invention made all of these functions obsolete.

Many people will do more when their interests and abilities make them the best income distribution point for work that does not require a degree.

If these people choose to acquire degrees with so-called high-income jobs than what they are good at, they may be displayed at the bottom of the revenue distribution of work.

In this article I will cover examples of young people who became great electrical engineers based on their abilities and interests, but he is considering becoming a manager at the university.

He can earn more with electrician's income distribution (annual $ 70,000), not the lowest managerial income distribution ($ 38,000 per year).

Inherent remuneration - Personal satisfaction due to doing a good job Results that bring personal satisfaction

Charles Murray's claim that "There are so many universities" means that the university is important, but not everyone needs a university. Murray wrote this article to stimulate us that the university is not suitable for everyone, as society forced individuals to obtain a bachelor's degree in college. For example, Murray states in the article that liberal arts in university education is not necessary for those who want to get a job of trade. If they want these people to go to vocational schools, they will receive the school education they need. In addition, Murray talked about the flaw in the way to obtain a theoretical baccalaureate. He said that work should not require university students to go on to university and link economic success with bachelor's degree, demanding that the system be changed, which is considered to be a "lazy" college dropout It places a burden. And because they did not complete their research they avoided them and led them to society. I think Murray's position on this topic is correct.

Are there too many people going to college? Charles Murray believes that the answer is yes. He considers the background of liberal arts to be important for cultural literacy, but stated that this education should be done at elementary or high school level. In his view, liberal arts is not the best choice for most high school graduates. While others can benefit more from vocational training, only those with the strongest academic ability can enjoy the effort needed for this degree. He believes that there are many vocational options requiring high salary vocational training He is a mediocre business manager to live a better life, but a student virtual who can become an excellent electric technician I will give you an example. In addition, when the Internet enables library databases and distance education, the actual university campus environment is not that important. .