“All that glitters” or “Not all that glitters”?

In the phrase finder (http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/all-that-glitters-is-not-gold.html), I found the "correct" syntax of this sentence. Everything is not gold. "It does not matter. I think this sentence is considerably off the tongue. It itself is very good.

I have also read the OP's question that "There is no flash in all money" that has nothing to do with my problem.

In other words, in addition to the reason of the pure style, is there a mini theory to explain this phenomenon?

I understand that people are more inclined to purely style reasons, specific statements or special grammar cited. As I said, sometimes tri tri, is, is, is, is, is is is Several statements by simply repeating within generations what can be accepted into cultural slang repertoire

Still, it seems that it is almost as good as "it is not gold to shine", but "Is not every glow is gold" is appropriate, logically, is not it? After all, why does not it shine if all the money is not shining? Is it really shining?

Perhaps I am overdone. Maybe this is not a problem. Perhaps the language develops this way, and nothing is necessarily illogical or irrational. Even if there are some non-logical or seemingly impossible things, the language is illogical (even if it is not irrational). As young people said today in their semi-deep way, "That's it."

Is the answer to my question based on some other explanation (or a combination of questions 1 and 2 and some other explanation)?

I am not asking the Internet to be filled with rainbow, sunshine, and flash. If you want to say something, all I have to ask is to be clever and raising voice. For teenagers, please understand at least the differences between "you" and "you" and "them", "they" and "where". Because there is nothing as annoying as writing 'No, your idiot', they will. "Crossing and swearing, especially grammar is not good, there is no evidence except that you do not actually have points.

In many cases, it is proved that English slang is primarily targeted to humans, "All shining things are not gold." A person who looks very beautiful or attractive but does not have internal quality is an example of "every shining thing is not gold". We can find thousands of cockroaches from the ocean, but only a fraction of them contain genuine pearls, others are just a waste. Human achievement is to assume or understand the essential quality behind a shiny person. In Japan there are many industries that require their employees and employees to see with artificial beauty, but they forget to remove the dark from the inside. In most cases, things are not realistic because they are looking from the outside. Sometimes, the appearance has nothing to do with the reality. What looks good from the outside is not good from the inside.