“The Necklace†Writing Assignment

Option A) Write a sequel "Necklace". Please tell me how Loisel replied that the necklace is fake. How does this discovery affect Lady Lois and her husband's life? Do not forget that the sequel is a story that continues to occur.

Option B) rewrites its end as "necklace". Beginning with your story, Mrs. Loisel did not lose necklaces. If she never lost a necklace, what is the difference in her life?

Writing components • Writing tasks to write assignment # 1 / writing up to 1 page • Writing samples according to assignment / hints (max 3 pages) • Issues / hints columns (up to 1 page) • Issue 2 / (Up to 1 page to write a hint) • Students write sentences according to assignment / hints (max 3 pages) • Task / hint sequence (up to 1 page) • Clearly labeled (Student A Or student B). Delete student's last name, teacher's name, or identification information about the student's family. • 8.5 "X 11" needs to be pasted on a small item (photo, etc.) on 8.5 "X 11" paper. o Note: If students create work samples, assignments / hints, or gauges on PowerPoint, HyperStudio, or other similar media, you can format up to six slides in the 8.5 "X 11" form. Each worksheet counts as one page of the total number of pages on the page.

My first class at the university was philosophy. And it changed my life forever. Our first job was to write a short essay in Albert Camus' s Myth of Sisyphus. I am very nervous about homework and college. But through the philosophical classroom turmoil, I answered many questions in my life. I am planning to acquire a degree in engineering from college. I like the way math has the right answer and the wrong answer. I understand the logic and I am very good at it. So, as soon as I got my first philosophical duty and asked me to write my explanation of the coronation thesis, I was immediately confused. What is the correct way to perform this task? I was anxious about the explanation of the mistake, so I did not want the first homework wrong. Even more annoying is that the professor refused to give us any guidance on what he was looking for and he gave us full freedom.

I was comparing "Necklace" and "Cinderella", but this story reminds me of more myths about Icaris. Mathilde gets more things and I'd like to use her talent to get what I want. She did it, her only crime was to try to fly high. Maupassant likes to use her "twist of the sea" to make her fall after melting her wings. Why do some people write such malicious and ironic stories beyond my scope? To publish such articles is beyond our scope, but with this in mind, the instructor may begin class discussion by distributing copies of this paragraph and asking for comments. Is Mathilde "using her natural talent" to get what she wants? Does Maupassant "depreciate" her? Is this story 'ominous and cynical?'